Prerequisites for The European Union Formation and Its Development Research Paper

Prerequisites for The European confederacy Formation and Its Development - Research Paper ExampleAt this stage in history, and despite realisation of the importance of integration, only six European countries, Belgium, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands, signed the Treaty of Paris (Biggs, 110-111). corking Britain, possibly encouraged by the fact that it was not part of continental Europe, refrained from signing this treaty.The second major(ip) stage in the formation of the EU came in the form of the Treaty of Rome in 1957 and the posterior creation of the European Economic Community. This treaty, as Gordon Weil explains, established the principles, laws and institutions for much closer economic cooperation, leading towards integration, amongst the member put ups. Again Britain refused to sign the treaty and rejected the prospect of European integration. As Loukas Tsoukalis explains, Britains resistance, as was the field of study wi th other European countries, was based on the simple fact that it feared that it would loose its national identity and that the British state would loose its sovereignty over the country. Quite simply stated, resistance to integration was based on the fear of the consequences of integration to national identity and sovereignty (439-441). ... Britain is, needless to say, one of the EUs most prominent members and inside the framework of the union, is a power in its own right. Despite the fact that it is a fully integrate EU member, not to mention an extremely influential one, and has benefited both politically and economically from its membership, Britain remains kind to the deeper economic and political integration which fiscal unification represents. Lee Miles, conceding that Economic and Monetary brotherhood has always been a sensitive policy area due to the fact that it entails the resignation of a comforting amount of sovereignty over domestic economies, argues that the econ omic benefits outweigh the loss to sovereignty (3). Even though monetary integration would necessitate Britains conceding large parts of its economic sovereignty to the EU, the facts seem to bear witness that Britain, as a signatory of the unmarried European Act and as a member state which is obligated to accept the supremacy of EU law, is not safeguarding its sovereignty over its domestic economy done its rejection of monetary unification. Quite simply stated, it has already resigned a significant amount of that sovereignty and has already authoritative the supremacy of EU law. This leads to the conclusion that rejection of monetary unification, while partly related to domestic fiscal and monetary policies, expresses Britains commitment to its national identity and heritage and its refusal that this identity is overwhelmed by the European one. Through an examination of the implications of the Single Europe Act and the doctrine of supremacy, the paper shall seek to prove this po int.